Impedance
Triangle vs Power Triangle
Included
Angle between Voltage and Current ( Leading / Lagging
)
Apparent
Power – Real/Active Power – Reactive Power
|
Power Source 1 220∠0∘ |
Power Source 2 Voltage is at an angle of ∠8∘ may
be owing to the effect of transformers from
the power source |
Incoming Power |
|
Owing to transformers in power source or other reason, come in voltage is already
8∘above X axis. |
Same Circuit With Different Power Source Angle |
|
|
Circuit Total Impedance ZTot |
ZTot = R+XL+XC
= (30+j0)+(0+j20)+(0-j10) = 30+j10Ω or 31.623∠18.435∘Ω Impedance Triangle Since the imaginary part of the
circuit total impedance is positive, so the
whole locoal circuit is an inductive circuit. |
|
Circuit Total Current ATot |
=6.957∠-18.435∘A Total included angle = I angle = 18.435∘as V angle = 0∘ |
=6.957∠-10.435∘A Total included angle = I angle + V angle = 18.435∘ The total
included angle 18.435∘between V & I does not change since
the total reactance of the circuit have not change. Only the position of the
whole power source change. |
|
As the angle of voltage does not affect the magnitude of
current, so the angle of voltage can be neglected during the calculation
of current except you want to know the angle of current to X axis line in Cartesian
coordinate graph. The included angle within the impedance triangle of the circuit
is 18.435∘ So the circuit total reactance will add
their effects to the incoming original included angle
between V & I and results an angle of 18.435∘even voltage change its angle. Obviously, the included angle between
voltage and current will be affected by locale reactive elements. If the circuit has a total reactance X > 0, than it is a
inductive circuit, and it will cause the current towards lagging. If the circuit has a total reactance X < 0, than it is a capacitive
circuit, and it will cause the current towards leading. Proved that the included angle between
voltage and current is affected by the included
angle of the total impedance triangle of
the circuit. |
|
Voltage of
each element |
VR = =
208.71∠-18.435∘V
A pure resistive element does not affect angle between V &
I, as the whole circuit already affected by some reactive elements, the V
& I come into R already changed as the circuits V & I angle, so the
result bare and angle equal to circuit V & I angle of 18.435∘
=
139.14∠ 71.565∘V XL is a reactive
element has a +90∘effect. Angle of come in power 0∘ The impedance effect angle on whole circuit -18.435∘ 90 + 0 + (-18.435) =71.565∘will
exist after XL
=
69.57∠-108.435∘V XC is a reactive
element has a -90∘effect. Angle of come in power 0∘ The impedance effect angle on whole circuit -18.435∘ (-90) + 0 + (-18.435) =-108.435∘will
exist after XC Counter
check : |
VR = =
208.71∠-10.435∘V R is a
non-reactive element Angle of come in
power +8∘ The impedance
effect angle on whole circuit -18.435∘ 8 + (-18.435) =
-10.435∘will exist after
R.
=
139.14∠ 79.565∘V XL is a reactive
element has a +90∘effect. Angle of come in power +8∘ The impedance effect angle on whole circuit -18.435∘ 90 + 8 + (-18.435) =79.565∘will
exist after XL
=
69.57∠-100.435∘V XC is a reactive
element has a -90∘effect. Angle of come in power +8∘ The impedance effect angle on whole circuit -18.435∘ (-90) + 8 + (-18.435) =-100.435∘will
exist after XC Counter
check : |
|
Please
note that the angle
value of the above result shows the angle of voltage or
current away from reference X axis depend on whether the angle value is
positive or negative, even the answer is
in unit of voltage. i.e. If
the angle value is +ve, it represents the voltage
angel away from reference X axis
line. If
the angle value is -ve, it represents the current
angel away from reference X axis
line. When
current
go through
each element,
the included angle between V &
I will then affected
by that element and a new included angle between V & I is formed. After
current pass through the last element back to power source, the final
circuit included angle between V & I will be detected. |
|
In terms of current Active Power
(P) |
PTot = |I|2 RTot (where RTot is real part of ZTot ) =
(6.957 )2 x
30 = 1452 W PTot = I2 RTot (Calculate with complex number of I
) =
(6.957∠-18.435∘)2 x 30 = 1452∠-36.87∘==>
1452W Note
: ∠-36.87∘is a double of lagging angle
-18.435∘of I |
PTot = |I|2 RTot (where RTot is real part of ZTot ) =
(6.957 )2 x
30 = 1452 W PTot = I2 RTot (Calculate with complex number of I
) =
(6.957∠-10.435∘)2 x 30 = 1452∠-20.87∘==>
1452W Note
: ∠-20.87∘is a double of lagging angle
-10.435∘of I |
|
It
shows that complex number part of I is not needed as it does not affect the magnitude
of real power calculation. |
|
Reactive Power
(Q) |
Calculate
with different value QXL = |I|2 XL = (6.957)2 (+j20) = j968 ==> 968 VAr = I2 |XL| = (6.957∠-18.435∘)2 (20)= 968∠-36.87∘ ==> 968 VAr = I2 XL = (6.957∠-18.435∘)2 (+j20)= 968∠53.13∘ ==> 968 VAr = |I|2 |XL|
= (6.957)2 (20) = 968VAr(Ind.) QXC = |I|2 |XC| = (6.957)2 (10) = 484VAr(Cap.) QTot = QXL - QXC
=
(968) - (484) = 484VAr(Ind.) Calculate
with total XTot ( XTot
is imaginary part of ZTot ) QTot =
|I|2 XTot
= (6.957)2 x +j10 = 484∠90∘ VAr =
I2 |XTot|
= (6.957∠-18.435∘)2 (10) = 484∠-36.87∘VAr =
I2 XTot
= (6.957∠-18.435∘)2 (+j10)= 484∠53.13∘ VAr = |I|2 |XTot| = (6.957)2 (10) = 484 VAr(Ind.) |
Calculate
with different value QXL = |I|2 XL = (6.957)2 (+j20) = j968 ==> 968 VAr = I2 |XL| = (6.957∠-10.435∘)2 (20) = 968∠-20.87∘ ==> 968 VAr = I2 XL = (6.957∠-10.435∘)2 (+j20) = 968∠69.13∘ ==> 968 VAr =
|I|2 |XL| = (6.957)2
(20) = 968VAr(Ind.) QXC = |I|2
|XC| = (6.957)2 (10) = 484VAr(Cap.) QTot = QXL - QXC = (968) - (484) = 484VAr(Ind.) Calculate
with total XTot ( XTot
is imaginary part of ZTot ) QTot =
|I|2 XTot
= (6.957)2 x +j10 = 484∠90∘ VAr =
I2 |XTot|
= (6.957∠-10.435∘)2 (10) = 484∠-20.87∘VAr =
I2 XTot
= (6.957∠-10.435∘)2 (+j10) = 484∠69.13∘ VAr = |I|2 |XTot| = (6.957)2 (10) = 484 VAr(Ind.) |
|
It shows that, no matter you are
calculating the reactive power Q for
individual or whole circuit, complex number part is not needed. |
|
In terms of Voltage Active Power
(P) |
PTot = |V |2 / RTot (RTot is the real
part of ZTot) = (208.71)2 / 30 = 1452 W PTot = V 2 / RTot (Calculate with complex number of V ) = ( 208.71∠-18.435∘)2 / 30 = 1452∠-36.87∘==> 1452W Note
: ∠-36.87∘is a double of lagging angle -18.435∘of I |
PTot = |V |2 / RTot (RTot is the real
part of ZTot) = (208.71)2 / 30 = 1452 W PTot = V 2 / RTot (Calculate with complex number of V ) = ( 208.71∠-10.435∘)2 / 30 = 1452∠-20.87∘==> 1452W Note
: ∠-20.87∘is a double of lagging angle
-10.435∘of I |
|
It
shows that complex
number part of V is not needed as
it does not affect the magnitude of real power calculation. |
|
Reactive Power
(Q) |
QTot = QXL
- QXC = 968 - 484 = 484VAr |
QTot = QXL
- QXC = 968 - 484 = 484VAr |
|
It
shows that complex
number part is not needed as it
does not affect the magnitude of reactive power calculation. |
|
All
Type of Power In
terms of I & Z |
All Type of
Power = |ITot | 2x ZTot = ( 6.957)2 x (30+j10) in rectangular form è =1452 - j484 P is the real part in W, Q is the imaginary part in VAr. in polar/phasor form è =1530.54∠18.435∘ The
magnitude represents Apparent Power S
in VA |
Same |
|
May use current (magnitude only) and complex form of ZTot
to calculate all type of power (apparent,
active, reactive) at the
same time of a circuit. |
|
In
terms of V
& Z |
in rectangular formè P is the real part in W, Q is the imaginary part in VAr. in polar/phasor form è The
magnitude represents Apparent Power S
in VA |
Same |
|
Since the
included angle between V & I will affect the result of real part(P) and
imaginary part(Q), don’t include
the angle value if you are not sure, just use the voltage magnitude only ( i.e. ∠0∘==> take voltage as reference ). |
|
In
terms of V
& I |
S
= V I = 220∠0∘( 6.957∠-18.435∘)
in rectangular form è = 1452 - j484 = 220∠-18.435∘( 6.957∠0∘) in rectangular form è = 1452 - j484 P is the real part in W, Q is the imaginary part in VAr. in polar/phasor form è = 1530.54∠-18.435∘ The
magnitude represents Apparent Power S
in VA *
Note * When using this method, either
voltage or current should take as reference.
i.e. V∠0∘or I∠0∘and the angle
used should be the total included
angle between V & I rather than individual V angle alone
nor I angle alone. You may put this total included
angle between V & I in voltage or current. You should find the total included angle between V & I , if they
both have an angle theirself, you may then
add up the absolute value of the two angles and then put the total angle on V
or I
only. |S|
= P
= S cos(θ) = 1530.54VA cos(-18.435∘) = 1452W Q
= S sin(θ) = 1530.54VA sin(-18.435∘) = 484VAr |
S = V I S = 220∠8∘x 6.957∠-10.435∘ in rectangular form è = in polar/phasor form è =1530.54∠-2.435∘ S = 220∠8∘x 6.957∠0∘ in rectangular form è = in polar/phasor form è =1530.54∠8∘ S = 220∠0∘x 6.957∠8∘ in rectangular form è = in polar/phasor form è =1530.54∠-8∘ S = 220∠0∘x 6.957∠-18.435∘= 1452 - j484 S = 220∠-18.435∘x 6.957∠0∘= 1452 - j484 S = 220∠0∘x 6.957∠18.435∘= 1452 + j484 S = 220∠18.435∘x 6.957∠0∘= 1452 + j484 P is the real part in W, Q
is the imaginary part in VAr. in polar/phasor form è = 1530.54∠18.435∘ The magnitude represents
Apparent Power S in VA The above examples prove that
you should take V or I as reference and put the
total angle value in V or I only. |
|
*
You may be already aware of that the included angle
of power triangle is equal to the total included angle between V & I ,
as well as the included angle of the impedance triangle. i.e.
Reactance element affects the total included angle
between voltage and current (leading or lagging), and in turn affects the
included angle of power triangle. |
|
Conclude |
Given
: E = 220∠0∘ and ZTot
= 30+j10 then
ITot = |E| / ZTot =220/(30+j10) =6.6 - j2.2 =6.957∠-18.435∘A Power
of each element in terms of | I | : PR =
| ITot
|2 x R = ( 6.957 )2
x 30 = 1452W QXL = | ITot |2 x XL = ( 6.957 )2
x 20 = 968VAr QXC = | ITot |2 x XC = ( 6.957 )2
x 10 = 484VAr Power
of each element in terms of individual voltage |V| : PR =
|VR|2 x R = (208.71 )2
/ 30 = 1452W QXL = |VXL|2
x XL = (139.14)2
/ 20 = 968VAr QXC = |VXC|2
x XC = (69.57 )2
/ 10 = 484VAr Calculate
all the power of P, Q, S at one time by using ZTot ( Since ZTot already have the
information about the circuit total
included angle, so you no need to include angle in V or I any
more. i.e. absolute value of V or I is
enough. All
type of Power = I2 x ZTot
= ( 6.957 )2 x (30+j10) = 1452 +j484 ç P is real part, Q is imaginary
part = 1530.54∠18.435∘ ç S is the magnitude value All
type of Power = V2 / ZTot
=
2202 / (30+j10) =
1452 –j484 =
1530.54∠-18.435∘ |
Given
: E = 220∠8∘ and ZTot
= 30+j10 then
ITot = |E| / ZTot =220/(30+j10) =6.6 - j2.2 =6.957∠-18.435∘A or ITot = E / ZTot =220∠8∘/ (30+j10) =6.842–j1.26 =6.957∠-10.435∘A or
try E = 220∠+12.435∘ I Tot = 220∠+12.435∘/ (30+j10) =6.913–j0.78 =6.957∠-6.435∘A Found
that no matter how you change the individual angle of V or I, the circuit total included angle between V &
I still fixed the same, as only the reactive element within the circuit may
affect it. The individual angle of V or I only affect the starting angle of
plotting position on graph. * The real
thing may affect the amount (magnitude) of
current and on
top of the given total included angle between V & I is the impedance triangle, the given individual angle of
voltage or current affect only the plotting coordinate position of V & I
on graph. |